Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05515
Original file (BC 2013 05515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05515

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Block 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect five years and five months rather than four years and eight months. 



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her original DD Form 214 states that she served during the period 24 Oct 75 through 26 Jun 80, which is equivalent to five years and six months.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 24 Oct 75.

On 23 Jun 80, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with four years and eight months of total active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. 



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The amount of service credit reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct.  The applicant entered the service on 24 Oct 75 and was discharged on 23 Jun 80, which is a period of four years and eight months.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05515 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Nov 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 13 Jan 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 14.

						






2





FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05261

    Original file (BC 2013 05261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 21 Mar 89 to 13 Oct 87 to include credit for the time he spent in Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp (AFROTC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05418

    Original file (BC 2013 05418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show his dates of service during the Vietnam Era. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant agrees that the DD Forms 214 have the correct dates of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05378

    Original file (BC 2013 05378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces Of the United States, dated 14 Oct 09, be changed to reflect a term of service of 6 years or 4 years with 24 months of obligated service instead of the 4 years of service it currently reflects. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05548

    Original file (BC 2013 05548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Jan 61, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for service credit in Vietnam. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05663

    Original file (BC 2013 05663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, effective 26 Sep 78, be changed to reflect his total active service dates as 11 Dec 71 through 26 Sep 78. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02448

    Original file (BC 2013 02448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his rank as “SGT” (sergeant), instead of “SRA” (senior airman). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2003-03941

    Original file (BC-2003-03941.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, they found the following; 1) no convening authority may apply the conditions on suspension to the confinement element of the adjudged sentence; 2) the period of suspension of the punitive discharge and reduction in grade, during which the applicant was required to participate satisfactorily in an acceptable sex offender FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 rehabilitation program, was limited to five years; 3) involuntary appellate leave was to be applied to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04901

    Original file (BC 2013 04901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the referral EPR itself should be removed from his record. The applicant contends that because pages of his rebuttal to the contested referral enlisted performance report (EPR) are missing, he is the victim of an injustice and the contested EPR should therefore be removed. Furthermore, while we note the comments of the Air Force OPR indicating that this Board should direct that the missing pages be added to his record, we are not convinced that the evidence provided by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05375

    Original file (BC 2013 05375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05375 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The AF Form 973, Air Force Request and Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders, revoking her AFCM be removed from her military records. The original award approval authority has since revoked this decoration and AFPC/DPSID removed the medal from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), per AF Form...